Tuesday, September 7, 2021

Rosh Hashannah Reflection: The ritual of Christian baptism as reported in Acts was (mostly) familiar to the period Jewish audience

So, I have been working through an in-depth commentary on the book of Acts as I have been learning and copying Acts in Latin. This passage on Pentecost and Baptism is particularly relevant right now during Rosh Hashannah 2021 (the Hebrew "New Year" preceding the Day of Atonement) as baptism, vis, ritual immersion in water as a symbol of atonement, was particularly practiced during the New Year, not inconceivably by Jesus of Nazareth Himself. It is, of course, recorded that he underwent baptism by John the Baptizer. John practiced and particulary emphasized atonement-by-immersion but hardly invented the practice.

My copy of the commentary, "El Libro de Hechos" por F.F. Bruce is in Spanish. "The Book of Acts" by F.F. Bruce is also available in English, I just don't happen to have it (nor have I the foggiest idea whether page numbers match), so I'll copy the relevant short bits of Spanish here and provide my own translation. Any mistakes are my own, almost certainly not that of F. F. Bruce. The  passage refers to Acts 2:38-41, the events immediately following the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost (an existing Old Testament Holy Day). Given here in English:

BSB  38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
39 This promise belongs to you and to your children and to all who are far off, to all whom the Lord our God will call to Himself.”
40 With many other words he testified, and he urged them, “Be saved from this corrupt generation.”
41 Those who embraced his message were baptized, and about three thousand were added to the believers that day.

Bruce's commentary text for v. 38:

Como en la predicación de Juan, la llamada al bautismo está unida a la llamada al arrepentimiento. Aparentemente el mandamiento de ser bautizados no ocasionó sorpresa. La práctica del bautismo resultaba bastante familiar a la audiencia de Pedro, a quien (como los oyentes de Juan antes que ellos) se les requería recibir el bautismo en agua como señal externa y visible de su arrepentimiento. Pero ahora había dos características nuevas en el rito del bautismo con agua: es la administración “en el nombre del Jesucristo” y se asoció con “el don del Espíritu Santo”. Esta nueva característica enfatiza, en las palabras de G.W.H. Lampe, que el bautismo cristiano “es todavía un rito escatológico, porque apuntaba hacia la redención final, la cual está aún por venir en el regreso en gloria del Señor; pero, considerado en relación a Juan el bautista, representaba la realización y cumplimiento de la esperanza de Israel”

And my rough English:

As in the preaching of Juan, the call to baptism is joined to the call to repentence. Apparently the command to be baptized occasioned no surprise [from the Jews there assembled]. The practice of baptism, it followed, was already familiar to Peter's audience, who (as with John's listeners before them) were called upon to receive the baptism in water as a visible and external sign of their repentance. But now he [Peter] required two new characteristics in the rite of baptism in water: it is administered in the "name of Jesus Christ" and associated with "the gift of the Holy Spirit". This new characteristic is emphasized, in the words of G.W.H. Lampe, that the Christian baptism "is in whole form an escatological [that is, of or concerning the end of days] rite, because it aimed to make that surrender final which is yet to come in the glorious return of the Lord, but, when considered in relation to John the Baptizer, represents the completion of the hope of Israel." [internal citation omitted]

--- Pasaje de: "El libro de los Hechos" por F. F. Bruce. Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/book/350613212 pp 161

As the commentary goes on to describe, both the existing (pre-Christian) ritual of baptism in water and the "gift of the Holy Sprit" whose outpouring that this (Jewish) assembly had just witnessed, are tied inextricably to the honest determination to repent and turn back to YHWH. Second Temple Jews immersing themselves (particularly but not exclusively) on Rosh Hashannah prior to Yom Kippur's communal Day of Atonement did not differ in that respect. Elsewhere, archaeologists have noted that the existence of basins for ritual immersion in water can practically be used to map the post-Diaspora spread of the remnants of Israel and Judea in ancient times.

The accounting imagery (not expressly anchored in scripture but an explanatory doctrine, likely never intended to be taken literally) of the between-time after sundown on Rosh Hashannah and before sundown on Yom Kippur is that YHWH, having closed the books on the previous year is writing his budget for the next, deciding who will be blessed and cursed, who will be written in the Book of Life and who will-- not. "On Rosh Hashannah it is writren; on Yom Kippur it is sealed." This in turn is obliquely, perhaps confusingly, referred to in Christian doctrine regarding the "Book of the Lamb" or "Book of Life of the Lamb" (e.g. Revelation 13:8). To a contemporaneous audience familiar with Rosh Hashannah and its oral tradition, the reference may have been much less opaque. But the expression here is similar to what G.W.H. Lampe is quoted as saying with respect to the essential eschatology of Christian baptism: that it is a poor bargain to endlessly petition to be left in the Book of Life for merely one more year (which many of us scarcely earn) against the chance of being written into the Book of the Lamb as an inheritor of the imminent and eternal Kingdom of the annointed Messiah (which not a single one of us has earned or ever will).

That all being said, the traditional ritual of periodic immersion in water as an external and visible sign of repentence is not without its use, nor is the yearly recognition of the Appointed Times for atonement. To the contrary, we can all of us use every reminder we can get. As linear creatures, we need timely reminders of our nature and duties. These were gifts to fallible forgetful humans intended to help us recognize and walk the steep path we are meant to daily walk. With the gift of the Holy Spirit and the constant help of divine grace, the impossible path becomes possible (though seldom easy). Thus the words of the Aveinu, "Our Father", itself a summary of Hebrew tradition:

Lead us not into temptation,

Yet free us from evil.

Min-hara (מן-הרע) in Hebrew, from (the) evil (one), is a reminder of min-hahar (מן-ההר), from the mountain, merely one letter off, referring to the traditional imagery of the steep path and constant struggle for right action. Sometimes-- no matter the tradition we come from-- we need to stop and wash off the dirt of the mountain to see the image of the divine within.

Friday, April 2, 2021

Latin Lesson: Stations of the Cross

While teaching our daughter first year Latin, it seemed appropriate to weave Good Friday into the lesson. I was brought up Catholic, later converted to Lutheran, and we have raised our daughter Lutheran. The Via Crucis (Way of the Cross), Via Doloroso (Way of Pain), or simply "Stations of the Cross" is an important and-- evocative-- observance in the Catholic faith which has largely been forgotten by Protestants. As Dietrich Bonhoeffer (WWII Lutheran theologian martyred by the Nazis) pointed out, sometimes Catholic traditions were dropped by Protestants reflexively because they were "too Catholic" but, like letting out the baby with the bathwater, some of the observances and traditions were extremely useful and important, worthy of consideration by Christians of all faiths. At the same time, they present opportunities for language education. So, to the blackboard:


The Passover Seder, another important observance often given too little attention by modern Christians, was designed to make a pivotal historical occurence real "from generation to generation". Each participant in a Seder is to consider that they, personally and individually, were lead forth from Egypt and delivered from slavery. The significance of the Paschal lamb, the unleavened bread, even the way the meal was to be eaten are brought into focus by the questions of the children: Why is this night different from all other nights? The traditions of the meal are designed to evoke imagery of a people on the verge of becoming, fleeing a bad but certain and familiar captivity into a promising but frightening and unknown freedom. For Christians, these symbols are not unimportant, the Paschal lamb sacrificed for Passover connecting to the Agnus Deii, the Lamb of God. The events of the Last Supper fit directly into the Passover meal: "And when the meal was ended, He took the cup..." fits directly before the Afikomen, the piece of unleavened bread which had been hidden in a cloth for the children to seek, making this cup the 3rd cup of wine in the Passover service, the "Cup of Redemption" and the bread he then broke the Afikomen itself. This then leads to the final cup of wine, the "Cup of Praise" which Christ says he will share with them "later". These enactments are important, but we seldom today stop to truly consider-- to wonder at-- them.
The Via Doloroso is also that kind of reenactment, to make the Road of Pain/Grief/Sorrow walked by a certain Ribbi Yeshuah Natzariim real and visceral, to put it in a concrete spiritual context often lost today in the midst of a new dress, eggs, bunnies, food, and family pictures. These gruesome scenes fall after the triumphant entry into Jerusalem of Palm Sunday, the Passover meal with friends and Disciples, before the cold tomb, and then the final triumph of the Resurrection. Traditionally, at the end of the enactment of the Stations of the Cross on Good Friday, following a prayerful fast, the Paschal Candle in the sanctuary-- the light that burns in the church day and night-- is extinguished, placing us all in the darkness of the tomb, only to be relit during the Easter Vigil service.
But where did these "stations" originate? Some of us Americans may have gone through the Patriot's Trail in Boston, the marked path and information stations leading to places of importance in our road to the Revolutionary War. Our family: wife, daughter, and myself, physically walked this path together some years ago. The Via Doloroso was a similar fixture in Jerusalem: a physical trail walked by pilgrims from station to station on the same path taken (as far as we know) by Christ on the day He was condemned and painfully executed. Most of those stations are identified concretely in Scripture, others were early church traditions, filling in events along the way where-- most likely but not assuredly-- they physically occurred. At each station, small shrines were erected. The Pilgrims often received small tokens which they would affix (affigo, affigere) to a cord around their neck or wrist: this is where we get "charm bracelets" today. During Holy Week, the Stations were often physically reenacted in a long procession.
During and after the Crusades, this physical journey became rather difficult. Because it became hard for even a minority of Christians to make this journey on their own behalf, churches began to set up their own mini stations and reenact the events themselves in their churches. This is what you see when you walk into a Catholic Church, usually carved and numbered plaques along both walls of the sanctuary. Catholics, between noon and three p.m. on Good Friday, would go to a service which moved from plaque to plaque. Growing up, some of us would dress in costume for this, someone standing in for Pontius Pilate (Pon-tee-us Pi-lah-tay in Latin), someone for Jesus, Simon, and the weeping women appearing where appropriate, etc. I still remember participatng in some of these in school, lifting the end of the board and thinking what it must have been like for Simon, drafted at sword point by the Romans, to suddenly become part of this gory drama, with no understanding at the time of where it would lead.
On the chalkboard, I have the Latin for each of the 14 traditional stations. Be aware, there are several, slightly different arrangements in tradition; which one you use does not necessarily matter given that you use them for their devotional purpose of compassion ("cum passus", suffering with) in Christ's journey. Under each I have the English. These are not direct translations. The traditional Latin and typical English labels are actually a bit different. In particular, the Latin labels often includevand focus on the physical location, such as VII. where Jesus falls "ad portis urbanis Ierusalem", "before the gatevof the city of Jerusalem". This focus makes sense given the origin of Via Doloroso as a physical route pilgrims actually walked. In English, we focus on the action.
As noted, "condemnatur" in Station I. Is the 3rd Person Singular Present Passive Indicative. Early Latin students may not have been introduced to the Passive, but it means "he was condemned". Jesus was the unwilling recipient of the action. In Station II., the verb is "suscepit", the 3rd Person Singular Present Indicative Active: Christ is performing the action by "taking up" His cross. They are all written in the present tense. You are supposed to think of this as happening before your eyes, "Look! See what is being done to the Teacher! What can this mean?" Consider the horror of the people-- bystanders, followers, friends, family, as they see this and think about people today with eyes glued to a YouTube video of someone being beaten, but physically present in the crowd.
This attitude is exemplified in the beautiful poignant spiritual "Were you there when the crucified my Lord?" ( https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BLJ0IjLAmOA )
In the image of the paper copy below, I write out more of the vocabulary, with the full forms and glosses copied from Whitaker's Words so they can be copied and memorized by students if desired. I also found a printable booklet ( https://www.saintanneshelper.com/printable-stations-of-the-cross.html ) of the Stations, the images of St. Alphonsus Liguori, and some prayers side-by-side in Latin/English. Each printed copy of the PDF makes two booklets. You cut across the middle, then fold the pages together and tie with a bit of yarn. These can be colored, and my daughter and I will likely do so through the weekend.
In any case, have a blessed holiday.



[Draft 1.0- first full pass, formatting and links need some fixing]

Monday, March 8, 2021

Notes on homicide laws MN vs MO in context of Derek Chauvin Trial

The Derek Chauvin Trial (related to use of force in the attempted arrest of George Floyd and his subsequent death in custody) has become bogged down in complex issues of criminal law, included the definitions of the different kinds of homicide in Minnesota (a National Review Article describes these issues and the timeline of changes to charges, motions, appeals).

Most lay people are unfamiliar with these areas of law or how they differ state-to-state. I was, myself, surprised at how Minnesota defines 3rd degree murder and that it is not a lesser-included offense to 2nd degree murder but rather has a different, specific purpose. In support of debate, this post contains the definitions of related offenses in Missouri with links to equivalent offenses in Minnesota. The reader is encouraged to flip through the links and compare, particularly looking at the placement of terms I emphasize such as knowingly, recklessly, negligently, etc., as these are exactly the terms upon which legal cases turn. For general background and definitions, I particularly recommend Samaha's "Criminal Law, 11th ed." which is targeted at lay (non-attorney) readers.

The notes themselves are copied from my own Evernote entry which I created for personal reference:

RSMO 565.021.  Second degree murder, penalty. — 1.  A person commits the offense of murder in the second degree if he or she:

  (1)  Knowingly causes the death of another person or, with the purpose of causing serious physical injury to another person, causes the death of another person; or

  (2)  Commits or attempts to commit any felony, and, in the perpetration or the attempted perpetration of such felony or in the flight from the perpetration or attempted perpetration of such felony, another person is killed as a result of the perpetration or attempted perpetration of such felony or immediate flight from the perpetration of such felony or attempted perpetration of such felony. [This is "Felony Murder".]

  2.  The offense of murder in the second degree is a class A felony, and the punishment for second degree murder shall be in addition to the punishment for commission of a related felony or attempted felony, other than murder or manslaughter.

...

[ In MN, the equivalent is 609.19 ( https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.19 )


RSMO 565.023.  Voluntary manslaughter, penalty — under influence of sudden passion, defendant's burden to inject. — 1.  A person commits the offense of voluntary manslaughter if he or she:

  (1)  Causes the death of another person under circumstances that would constitute murder in the second degree under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 565.021, except that he or she caused the death under the influence of sudden passion arising from adequate cause; or

  (2)  Knowingly assists another in the commission of self-murder.

  2.  The defendant shall have the burden of injecting the issue of influence of sudden passion arising from adequate cause under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of this section.

  3.  The offense of voluntary manslaughter is a class B felony.



RSMO 565.024.  Involuntary manslaughter, first degree, penalty. — 1.  A person commits the offense of involuntary manslaughter in the first degree if he or she recklessly causes the death of another person.
  2.  The offense of involuntary manslaughter in the first degree is a class C felony, unless the victim is intentionally targeted as a law enforcement officer, as defined in section 556.061, or the victim is targeted because he or she is a relative within the second degree of consanguinity or affinity to a law enforcement officer, in which case it is a class B felony.


RSMO 565.027.  Involuntary manslaughter, second degree, penalty. — 1.  A person commits the offense of involuntary manslaughter in the second degree if he or she acts with criminal negligence to cause the death of any person.

  2.  The offense of involuntary manslaughter in the second degree is a class E felony, unless the victim is intentionally targeted as a law enforcement officer, as defined in section 556.061, or the victim is targeted because he or she is a relative within the second degree of consanguinity or affinity to a law enforcement officer, in which case it is a class D felony.



[MN has only one Involuntary Manslaughter offense, 609.205 ( https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.205 )]

(MN) 609.195 MURDER IN THE THIRD DEGREE.

(a) Whoever, without intent to effect the death of any person, causes the death of another by perpetrating an act eminently dangerous to others and evincing a depraved mind, without regard for human life, is guilty of murder in the third degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 25 years. [This is referred to as "Depraved Indifference Homicide"; we do not appear to have this in Missouri law.]

(b) Whoever, without intent to cause death, proximately causes the death of a human being by, directly or indirectly, unlawfully selling, giving away, bartering, delivering, exchanging, distributing, or administering a controlled substance classified in Schedule I or II, is guilty of murder in the third degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than 25 years or to payment of a fine of not more than $40,000, or both.


Missouri, Lesser-Included Offense:

565.029.  Lesser degree offenses in homicide cases — instruction on lesser offenses, when. — 1.  With the exceptions provided in subsection 3 of this section and subsection 3 of section 565.021, section 556.046 shall be used for the purpose of consideration of lesser offenses by the trier in all homicide cases.

  2.  The following lists shall comprise, in the order listed, the lesser degree offenses:

  (1)  The lesser degree offenses of murder in the first degree are:

  (a)  Murder in the second degree under subdivisions (1) and (2) of subsection 1 of section 565.021;

  (b)  Voluntary manslaughter under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 565.023;

  (c)  Involuntary manslaughter in the first degree; and

  (d)  Involuntary manslaughter in the second degree;

  (2)  The lesser degree offenses of murder in the second degree are:

  (a)  Voluntary manslaughter under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 565.023;

  (b)  Involuntary manslaughter in the first degree; and

  (c)  Involuntary manslaughter in the second degree.

  3.  No instruction on a lesser included offense shall be submitted unless requested by one of the parties or the court.


Minnesota Lesser-Included Offense:

609.04 CONVICTION OF LESSER OFFENSE.

Subdivision 1.Lesser offense prosecution.

Upon prosecution for a crime, the actor may be convicted of either the crime charged or an included offense, but not both. An included offense may be any of the following:

(1) a lesser degree of the same crime; or

(2) an attempt to commit the crime charged; or

(3) an attempt to commit a lesser degree of the same crime; or

(4) a crime necessarily proved if the crime charged were proved; or

(5) a petty misdemeanor necessarily proved if the misdemeanor charge were proved.

Subd. 2.Conviction; bar to prosecution. A conviction or acquittal of a crime is a bar to further prosecution of any included offense, or other degree of the same crime.

Thursday, January 21, 2021

EO Threatens Schools Who Will Not Let Men in Women's Sports

I wonder why it is so hard for people to grasp the simple concept that men do not belong in women's sports? That this discriminates against women who fought hard to have these sports in the first place? Why willful indifference to girls like Selina Soule who are displaced by men unable to compete in male sports?

<<The conservative Alliance Defending Freedom has filed a federal complaint on behalf of a Connecticut high school student, Selina Soule, who failed to quality for the New England regionals after losing a race to two biological male students who identify as girls.

“In fact, one of the athletes who displaced Selina previously competed against other male athletes in the winter 2018 season and failed to advance in boys’ indoor track events,” the ADF said. “It wasn’t until that athlete began competing in girls’ events during the 2018 spring season that the dominance began. This biological male now holds more than 10 records within the state of Connecticut that once belonged to 10 different girls.”>>

If Biden carries out his threat to cut federal funding for schools who do not go with him off the cliff, we, as a state, should take him up on it, and for better reasons than this: after being incompetently thrashed around first by No Child Left Behind then by Common Core, it is clear that the federal behemoth-- and the large corporate curriculum cartel it feeds-- having too much influence on education is bad for our children no matter who is in the Oval Office, no matter who is in Congress. DC Republicans have often been just as eager to expand federal power over our schools, especially when it expands budgets for corporate handouts. At exactly the time that more and more education resources become ubiquitous, low-cost, or even free, inpouring of federal money and the imprimatur  of thoroughly-captured standards boards has lead to inflation of education costs and consolidation of vendors.

This Biden EO is just the latest symptom of a deeper problem both parties created. If we do not have control of our own children's education, we will always be held hostage to corporate profiteering or misplaced ideological rubbish imposed from the top.

This is just one more place where it is past time Missouri minded its own business... and told others to mind theirs.


Monday, January 11, 2021

Capitol Riot Officer-Involved Shooting

This page will organize a set of sources and commentary on the Officer-Involved Shooting during the 2021 US Capitol Riots on 6 January in which Alisha Babbitt was killed. The intent here is to have these sources and links in one place for ease of discussion and debate, including analysis of police use of force involved by myself or by others. Gathering sources will come first and commentary will be added later. It will need to be reorganized as I go.
Version 0.4: 15 January 2021 (Added a number of links including more videos and more background on Babbitt.)

Disclaimer: This page and any commentary on it is my own and not an official statement of any organization. There are clearly both political and non-political issues here (or, at least, some issues which should not be political). A subset of these issues, those dealing with use-of-force and the shoot/no-shot decision separated (as much as possible) from the political context, will be discussed using these sources at the 11 January meeting of the Lawrence County Sheriff's Auxiliary. This page, however, does not represent that discussion. The use of force analysis will almost certainly have to change over time in any case as more information is known, so no such analysis could be definitive at this time. Clearly, the videos linked here are going to contain graphic content and this discussion will be of a violent subject: if you do not wish to be exposed to such content, do not continue.

What Are the Questions?

Let's start out with a decent framing of the questions. LegalInsurrection does a decent job in "Video of Shooting Death of Ashli Babbitt Raises Questions About Use of Deadly Force". Deciding on major questions (and dispensing with less useful questions) should guide inquiry and gathering of sources. The primary issues I am interested in here are:

* Was the individual officer's use of force correctly made and justified?

* Who actually made the choice? Was it the individual officer or did he act in response to an order given? Or was the choice part of a mission parameter/rule of engagement? (e.g. "Do not fire unless the barrier is breached, but do not permit protesters to enter this lobby.")

* Why was the officer who made the shoot/no-shoot decision put in the position of having to make that choice? In other words, were other failures made in the larger response which might have prevented the necessity of fatal confrontation. Potential "lessons learned" are crucial for security planning in future events in this crazy political climate.

* What larger liability might apply to others involved in illegal activity (i.e. the Felony Murder question)

* What were the actual and perceived physical threats presented by Babbitt and the larger incident?

Questions which I do not feel are terribly useful:

* Was what Babbitt did wrong/illegal? The answer to this question is rather obvious and there can be little doubt that climbing a broken barricade was not a lawful or peacable act. The further intentions of the deceased cannot be gauged and, as she is deceased, there is no question of further punishment.

* Did Babbitt "deserve to die"? This is often too ill-defined a question to answer and too wrapped up in political/ideological perceptions. It is clear that her act was willful, illegal, and dangerous. There is no reason to suppose that she was unaware that her actions were risky and might lead to injury or death. Nor does answering such a question change the fact that she did, in fact, die whether she "deserved it" or not.

Videos of the Shooting

Information on the Capitol Riots is frequently taken down. There is no guarantee that the following sources will continue to exist indefinitely. Please inform me of broken links in comments (or better sources) and I will attempt to fix them. The video of the incident itself are crucial for looking at use-of-force questions.

Heavy.com commentary with Twitter link to the original Sulivan video: https://heavy.com/news/ashli-babbitt-video-capitol-shooting/ This video is the first one widely shared but shows little context and it is not easy to get a sense of the space around the incident. The LegalInsurrection link above also has the same video.

Two videos with commentary by the Washington Post showing a different viewpoint than the Sullivan video and more context before the shooting: (MSN link) This link also contains a map of the Capitol showing the area of interest.
 
Bell?ngCat's "The Journey of Ashli Babbit" has several video links in one place, including a link to a YouTube video which combines and sinks four videos into one. 

TheResistance has a 44-minute video showing the entire progression from entry into the Capitol to the Officer-Involved Shooting.

The question of the shoot/no-shoot decision is more complicated than justification. There is also a larger safety question involved. Training and policy typically dictates discharging a weapon only with a clear target and clean background. As can be seen from these videos, the "background" to the shot was quite complicated and rapidly changing, something which may be hard for people to appreciate if they have not stood behind a gun (in training or a live incident) and had to try to make such a decision. To the left of the barrier (facing into the lobby, opposite to the shooter's perspective) were more protesters and people filming (whether or not 'protesters'). To Babbitt's right were Capitol Police staging on the descending stairwell. Behind the doors in the lobby were more Capitol Police and officials sheltering. Behind the frontline of protesters were other protesters who may not have presented an immediate threat and, seemingly, other police. Any weapon discharge might potentially hit friendly, neutral, or unknown targets. It is possible that the shooter had (or perceived) a background which was only momentarily clean, while Babbitt was elevated above others and before she made it into the lobby proper. Only at that moment (arguably) could a round aimed at Babbitt at an upward angle avoid striking others. This may have determined the timing of the shot; any additional video or information to this question may be very important.


Legal Commentary
The question of whether what Ashli Babbitt did was illegal is clear (it was not) and moot (she is dead and therefore there is no point in charging her with a crime). The incident has larger implications for the use-of-force inquiry into the shooting and the potential charges for others who were present. This section will gather some relevant commentary as I find it.

A discussion of Felony Murder  in the context of the Capitol Riot and the death of Ashli Babbitt. Includes definition of Felony Murder, references DC statutes, and looks through the circumstances of her death in that light.

Ashli Babbitt

Some background on Ashli Babbitt from Heavy.com and NYPost. Also some (limited) information about past charges for property damage and a restraining order. Bell?ngCat has a detailed article, "The Journey of Ashli Babbitt" describing the chnages in political views over time from Obama supporter to Trump supporter to QAnon.

John Sullivan

Sullivan is a controversial individual because he recorded the first widely-distributed video of Ashli Babbitt's death while standing in the Capitol nearby. Sullivan is not a Trump Supporter (nor does he appear to be a member of Antifa) but from Insurgence USA, an organization for "racial justice and police reform" who is decidedly anti-Trump. So, ineveitably, the question arises: what was he doing in the Capitol and what were his motives? This link from PJ-Media includes a number of other links discussing this question and the more general question of who might or might not have been associated with Antifa. It also includes a video of Trump Supporters stopping someone who is (claimed to be) Antifa from breaking into a Capitol window. It is clear, therefore that the situation may have been complex and more research is needed on who was there, why they were there, and just what they thought they were doing.

Friday, October 2, 2020

Tea Time: What is a crumpet, anyway?

Tea and crumpets. It is a phrase many of us have heard, conjuring images of steaming Earl Grey served in porcelain cups and overstuffed armed chairs. But what is a crumpet? Recently, I dug up a recipe and made a batch.


 

Crumpet with buter and jam on a plate.
Crumpet rings, tea is whistlin'; On the cake, butter's glistening. We're humming a song as we munch along...

A "crumpet" is a griddle cake, something like a cross between a pancake and an English muffin. Unlike a pancake, crumpets are yeast-risen and fluffy, big foamy bubbles form the "nooks and crannies" that absorb plenty of warm butter and jam. Crumpets are grilled on one side only at first and toasted before serving. They are an old English tradition, going back in some form for centuries, first fomally mentioned by the Bible translator, John Wycliffe, in the 14th century and later described in closer to the their current form by Elizabeth Raffald in "The Experienced English Housekeeper" in the 18th century [Oxford Online Reference Library].

The ready-to-cook batter is much too soft to stand on its own while cooking, so the crumpets are formed in metal rings, crumpet rings. Good crumpet rings are stainless steel and double-rolled to present a smooth, easy-to-clean surface for consistent crumpet extraction. Most people don't have them, however, and it's not like you can just pick them up at an typical American store. Canning jar lids are not at all ideal, but they do (mostly) work. (They probably offend some deep-seated English taboo, so exercise caution. I have no idea how a Brit would resond to them being served with hot coffee, either...)


My crumpet adventure started with a recipe from the Daring Gourmet. I was with the in-laws and made a double batch. I did not double the salt. So, the ingredients list ended up being:

  • 4 cups of flour, sifted. Half of this was recently ground, half store-bought because I ran out of fresh.
  • 1 teaspoon salt
  • 2 cups warm milk
  • 2 tablespoons active dry yeast
  • 2 teaspoons sugar
  • 2 cups warm water
  • 1 teaspoon baking soda

As instructed in that recipe, the batter is made in two stages, first making and rising a spongy dough, then beating in more liquid and resting for 30 minutes. The recipe specifically states not to worry about beating all of the lumps out when mixing the batter: you want some variation in texture. The rising process is very important to getting the big bubbles in the batter (you can see this in my picture of crumpets on the griddle). On this particular day, my wife was also baking, so the area was nicely warm for the rising and it doubled in size fairly quickly. Your mileage may vary. Proof your yeast and go by actual rising, not the clock-time.

The rings are necessary to get the batter to stand up enough to get decently-thick crumpets. The canning jar lids are not ideal and take some fiddling. I used a mix of narrow and wide mouth rings because that is what my inlaws had in the cupboard. I found that it was best to fill them 2/3rds full with batter on the hot, greased griddle. Preheat the griddle until a droplet of water dances. The crumpets expand when cooking and will overflow if the ring is overfilled. The crumpets are flatter and kindof crispy when underfilled. They have a pleasant, yeasty aroma while cooking.

Grease the rings well! I used cooking spray, again, because it was what I had on hand. When the rings were not greased well, underfilled or overfilled, I suffered Crumpet Extraction Failure (CEF). I had to force the cooked crumpet out and then had to try to quickly scrub and regrease the ring for the next batch. This was a substantial pain-in-the-you-know-what. When the rings were filled correctly and greased well, the crumpets dropped right out, even with the threads in the rings. When you are still learning, you probably want to have a large stock of clean rings handy, preferably the wide-mouth ones. That way, when CEF occurs, you can just set it aside temporarily and grab a clean ring.

The Crumpet Extraction Falure (CEF) condition. Avoid this. Have spare rings in case you do not avoid it.

Since some of the crumpets were to be served right away, I toasted them right on the hot griddle after everything was done. Turn up the heat a bit for proper toasting. The crumpets made with wide-mouth rings fit in a slot toaster, the small ones not safely. In civilized places, crumpets are supposed to be served cut in half (half-moons, not sliced like English muffins!). Again, this worked well for the larger rings, not so well for the smaller. The crumpets were slathered with butter and optionally homemade strawberry jam or honey, served with tea. They were a big hit with our teenage daughter who is now angling for me to make more.

The doubled recipe made 30 crumpets of mixed sizes. I found that the leftovers were best stored in brown paper because they were otherwise retaining too much moisture.

Some people do all kinds of unnatural things with crumpets, including topping with ham and cheese, curry, etc. Diehards stick to butter and jam or honey. Or just butter.

Thursday, September 3, 2020

Exocytosis, Stage Left: Coronavirus strategies for spreading infection

On a cellular biology level, learning about SARS-CoV-2 opens up a micro-world of epic struggles: stealth and trickery, strategem and counter, adaptation and (usually) survival. This is an early stab at the fifth panel for the redo of Bat Soup: the Graphic Novel in which we attempt to teach really tough biology concepts in a fun way. In this panel, we show the strange ways the virus spreads itself once it successfully enters the cell, takes over its machinery, and  forces the ribosome to start transcribing its proteins to make copies. When I have it where I want it, I will do the final copy on an 11"x14" Bristol Board where I will able to get finer detail with a less cluttered layout.

Endocytosis: In previous panels, we show the dastardly virus using a disguise to evade the immune system to successfully approach the cell. Its spike protein is initially rotated downward and harder for the immune system to recognize. The virus makes use of a host pro-protein such as furin to properly align the spike protein at the S1/S2 boundary so it can activate the ACE2 receptor to make entry into the cell (endocytosis).
The SARS-CoV-2 virus needs a human proprotein, furin, to correctly position its spike protein at the S1/S2 boundary before it can invade a cell.
Snippet from Panel 1

Infiltration and Replication: Once inside, the coronavirus then makes further use of existing human proteins such as cathepsin to unpack its payload and start transcription of its own proteins encoded in its RNA genome. At about 30,000 basepairs, these SARS coronavirus are among the largest and most complex RNA genomes known. So, now that the virus has taken over the cell's fabrication facility, a fleet of new virus particles is being constructed!

So what happens next? Most (lay) descriptions of viral replication just say that the virus causes the cell membrane to rupture so it can surge forth and infect more cells. With most viruses, there is more to it than that and, anyway, with the SARS viruses, particularly SARS-CoV-2 it takes a very different path-- mediated by the "non-structural proteins" in its complex genome which is only partly understood. Programmed cell death, "Apoptosis", does likely happen, but the virus has already spread by then and it is done for a much more cunning reason (which we'll get to in Panel 6).
In the meantime, though, in Panel 5: the viral horde is unleashed.

Viral proteins are synthesized and folded in the Endoplasmic Reticulum and then packaged in smooth-walled vesicles; these vesicles can then merge with the cell membrane to release mature virus into the intercellular space; leaked S-proteins can also cause nearby cell-membranes to merge, allowing virus to directly invade neighboring cells
Bat Soup, the Graphic Novel, Panel 5 concept sketch
The Endoplasmic Reticulum: A long time ago in a galaxy far away when I tutored Cell Biology to make a little side money for college, the Endoplasmic Reticulum and the viral transcription process was something most people seemed to have trouble with. It's extraordinarily complicated, and we are still learning. But I always found it helped to picture it like an WWII-era industrial complex, tiers of concrete and banks of windows (some of them are broken out) rising, the ribosomes stuck to the sides. This is the Rough ER, where the magic of protein synthesis and folding happens. I then picture the Smooth ER, where lipid synthesis happens (the stuff that makes cell membranes, among other things), as rising stacks because they are round and smooth like chimneys or pipes. The nucleus is a walled-complex just beyond the factory.

This is the structure the virus has taken over. The ribosomes start decoding RNA sequences: cytosine, guanine, adenine, and uracil, and stringing together chains of amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. But finished proteins aren't just strings of amino acids (AAs), they are complex 3D structures. The Endoplasmic Reticulum is where those chains of AAs are folded into completed structures like enzymes or hormones... or the shell of a new virus particle.

Exocytosis: Once the viral structure is fabricated, the replicated RNA strand is placed inside and the whole assembled inside smooth-walled vesicles small bubbles inside the cell which are made out of pieces stolen from the Endoplasmic Reticulum. The result is little packets of virus-laden food service condiment packets (extra spicey!) being arrayed inside the cell. But the virus does not have to burst the cell open to escape. At the command of virus-provided S-proteins, pores form in the surface of the cell and merge with the smooth-walled vesicles, pouring virus into the intercellular space (the spike protein once more disguised) where they can find more cells to infect. This is "exocytosis".

Synctium: But, this virus has another trick for avoiding the immune system, particularly deep in the lungs: it doesn't have to leave the cell to spread. The hostage cell starts leaking S-proteins into the intercellular fluid. The S-proteins cause the cell membranes of nearby cells to merge together. Long multinucleated cells called "synctium" start to form which share the same cytoplasm-- and the same viral infection! As we will see in future panels, the cell, including these multi-nucleates mega-cells, can end up dying several different ways.


This cycle of formation of mega-cells, their destruction, and the body's attempt to heal and regrow tissue is a big reason the virus can cause such massive tissue damage and scarring inside lung tissue. The immune response often makes the situation even worse. Understanding how it works and why some people get away with minimal damage may be a key to effective treatment of severe cases.